Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies

From: Flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath versus traditional ureteral access sheath for flexible ureteroscopy in renal and proximal ureteral stones: a meta-analysis of efficacy and safety

Sdudy

Sdudy design

Sample size

(FANS/T-UAS)

Age (years)

(FANS/T-UAS)

Pre-stenting rate

(FANS/T-UAS)

Stone location

Stone burden assessment

Stone size (cm)

(FANS/T-UAS)

UAS size (Fr)

Laser settings

Evaluation of SFR

Stone free definition

Follow-up duration

Huang 2023

retrospective

103/103

54.7/54.7

28.2%/25.2%

Kidney, ureteral

stone diameter

1.7/1.7

11/13,12/14

Ho: YAG

1.2 J, 20 HZ

CT

< 3 mm

1 month

Zhang 2023

retrospective

102/112

47.7/46.8

45.1%/42%

Kidney

stone diameter

1.85/1.82

12/14

Ho: YAG

0.6–1.2 J, 20–30 HZ

KUB, CT

< 2 mm

3 months

Chen 2024

retrospective

125/113

45.6/46.3

NR

Kidney

stone diameter

2.81/2.68

12/14

Ho: YAG

1 J, 30 HZ

CT

< 2 mm

1 month

Uslu 2024

retrospective

43/45

56/55

No stenting

kidney

stone diameter

1.0/1.1

9.5/11.5

Ho: YAG

0.5 J, 20 HZ

CT

< 3 mm

1 month

Ying 2024

retrospective

103/138

53.1/53.9

25.2%/20.3%

kidney

stone diameter

1.55/1.56

11/13,12/14,13/15

Ho: YAG

0.6–0.8 J, 20–25 HZ

KUB, US, CT

< 2 mm

3 months

Yu 2024

retrospective

152/152

51.1/50.5

7.2%/9.2%

Kidney, ureteral

stone diameter

stone volume

1.55/1.52

12/14

Ho: YAG

1–1.2 J,

15–30 HZ

CT

zero stone fragments

3 months

Zhu 2024

RCT

160/160

53/52

11.9%/13.8%

Kidney, ureteral

stone diameter

stone volume

stone surface

1.4/1.1

10/12,11/13,12/14

Ho: YAG

< 30 W

KUB, US, CT

< 2 mm

3 months

Hu 2025

retrospective

78/127

55/54

24.4%/29.1%

kidney

stone diameter

1.6/1.6

12/14

Ho: YAG

0.8–1.2 J,

20 HZ

US, CT

< 2 mm

1 month

  1. SFR, stone-free rate; KUB, kidney-ureter-bladder X-ray; US, ultrasonography; NR, not reported