Skip to main content

Table 3 Key findings on bladder volume, compliance, spinal lesion level, and sensation thresholds in children with Spina Bifida

From: Anorectal manometry and urodynamics in children with spina bifida: can we predict the colonic dysmotility from bladder dysfunction?

Sensation Threshold

Metric

Cystometric Bladder Capacity (ml)

Below Threshold

Cystometric Bladder Capacity (ml)

Above Threshold

p-value

 

Average

209.44

275.89

0.143

First Sensation Volume (< 50 ml vs. >50 ml)

SD

119.74

96.79

 
 

Median

195.00

254.00

 
 

Average

260.79

217.91

0.396

Urge to Defecate Volume (< 70 ml vs.70–150 ml)

SD

88.50

138.11

 
 

Median

246.00

200.00

 
 

Average

374.67

223.82

0.037*

Maximum Tolerable Volume (< 160 ml vs. >160 ml)

SD

113.74

101.87

 
 

Median

346.00

228.50

 

Sensation Threshold

 

Compliance Value (ml/cmH2O)

Below Threshold

Compliance Value (ml/cmH2O)

Above Threshold

 
 

Average

10.13

12.69

0.662

First Sensation Volume (< 50 ml vs. >50 ml)

SD

8.84

12.28

 
 

Median

8.00

8.45

 
 

Average

12.55

10.39

0.681

Urge to Defecate Volume (< 70 ml vs.70–150 ml)

SD

12.52

6.13

 
 

Median

7.41

9.11

 
 

Average

12.97

11.41

0.277

Maximum Tolerable Volume (< 160 ml vs. >160 ml)

SD

4.06

10.70

 
 

Median

11.30

8.00

 

Sensation Threshold

Spinal Defect Level

 
 

LD

UD

 

First Sensation Volume (< 50 ml vs. >50 ml)

n (%)

8 (44.4) vs. 10 (55.6)

8 (88.9) vs. 1 (11.1)

0.033*

Urge to Defecate Volume (< 70 ml vs.70–150 ml)

n (%)

3 (21.4) vs. 11 (78.6)

6 (54.5) vs. 5 (45.5)

0.098

Maximum Tolerable Volume (< 160 ml vs. >160 ml)

n (%)

1 (33.3) vs. 2 (66.7)

8 (36.4) vs.14(63.6)

0.713

  1. Notes: p < 0.05 indicates statistical significance. A lower p-value signifies stronger evidence against the null hypothesis, suggesting a real effect