Skip to main content

Table 2 Evaluations of the selected research literature based on the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for retrospective case-control studies

From: Comparison of the efficacy and safety of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of kidney stones in overweight or obese patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study

Selection

Comparability

Outcome

Total scores

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

Liu, X. et al. (2022) [24]

★

★

/

★

★

★

★

★

★

8

Chen, H.Q. et al.(2018)[16]

★

★

/

★

★

★

★

★

★

8

Xu, C. et al.(2020)[18]

★

★

/

★

★

★

★

★

★

8

Ozgor, F. et al.(2016)[14]

★

★

/

★

★

★

★

★

★

8

Cepeda, M. et al.(2017) [15]

★

★

/

/

★

/

★

★

★

6

Armagan, A. et al.(2015)[15]

★

★

/

★

★

/

★

★

★

7

Ozgor, F. et al.(2018)[17]

★

★

/

★

★

★

★

★

★

8

Schoenthaler, M. et al.(2015)[13]

★

★

/

★

★

★

★

★

★

8

Pillai, S.B. et al.(2021) [19]

★

★

/

★

★

★

★

★

★

8

  1. A: adequate case definition; B: representativeness of the cases; C: selection of controls; D: definition of controls; E: study controls for the most important factor; F: study controls for any additional factor; G: ascertainment of exposure; H: some methods of ascertainment for cases and controls; I: non-response rate