Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of normal “Bell Shaped” and abnormal urination curves on PF studies and non-invasive EMG uroflowmetry tests

From: A comparative study between EMG uroflowmetry with and without a catheter in children

 

Abnormal curve

(PF /non-invasive EMG uroflowmetry)

Normal curve

(PF /non-invasive EMG uroflowmetry)

Sensitivity (95% CI)

Specificity

(95% CI)

Positive predictive value

(95% CI)

Negative predictive value

(95% CI)

All children

31/37

13/33

83% (68-93)

39% (23-57)

61% (53-67)

68% (48-83)

Sex, males

11/12

3/11

91% (62-22)

27% (6-60)

57% (47-67)

75% (26-96)

Sex, females

20/25

10/22

80% (59-93)

45% (24-67)

62% (52-71)

66% (44-83)

Age 4-9 years

16/20

6/16

80% (56-94)

37% (15-64)

61% (50-71)

60% (33-81)

Age 10-18 years

15/17

7/17

88% (63-98)

41% (18-67)

60% (49-69)

77% (45-93)

  1. Abbreviations CI- confidence interval; EMG- electromyography; PF- pressure flow