Skip to main content

Table 4 Logistic regression analysis results of AIP index and kidney stones, weighted

From: Association between the atherogenic index of plasma and kidney stones: a nationally representative study

Kidney stones

OR (95%CI), P value

Non-adjusted model 1

Adjusted model 2

Adjusted model 3

Continuous

 TG

1.07 (1.03, 1.11), < 0.001

1.04 (1.00, 1.08), 0.031

1.03 (0.98, 1.07), 0.252

 HDL-c

0.58 (0.50, 0.67), < 0.001

0.59 (0.50, 0.68), < 0.001

0.73 (0.62, 0.87), < 0.001

 TG/HDL-c

1.04 (1.02, 1.07), < 0.001

1.03 (1.01, 1.06), 0.013

1.03 (0.99, 1.06), 0.103

 AIP index

1.92 (1.64, 2.25), < 0.001

1.58 (1.34, 1.88), < 0.001

1.32 (1.08, 1.61), 0.006

Categories

 Tertile 1

1.00

1.00

1.00

 Tertile 2

1.41 (1.23, 1.63), < 0.001

1.25 (1.08, 1.45), 0.003

1.12 (0.95, 1.30), 0.169

 Tertile 3

1.76 (1.54, 2.03), < 0.001

1.46 (1.27, 1.69), < 0.001

1.23 (1.04, 1.44), 0.014

P for trend

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

  1. Adjusted model 2: age, gender, and race were adjusted
  2. Adjusted model 3: additionally adjusted for annual household income, education level, physical activity, smokers, diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, BMI, ALT, AST, GGT, glycohemoglobin, FPG, TC, LDL, Scr, SUA, and eGFR
  3. OR odds ratio, 95% CI 95% confidence interval
Back to article page

BMC Urology

ISSN: 1471-2490

Contact us